Warriors ARE weaker than Legionnaires - once again, you would expect an Iron Age unit to beat a Bronze Age unit, won't you?.I am now in the Colonial Age, and my musketeers have the same number of "lifepoints" as your Bronze or Iron Age units. By the way, all units have 10 "lifepoints", to use your terminology. The advantage that Horsemen have over Spearfighters is that they can move over greater distances excellent for taking out ranged units, especially with a +3 attack and defense bonus against them.Slingers ARE weaker than Archers - you would expect an Iron Age unit to beat a Bronze Age unit, won't you?.Let me try to address your issues one by one: Why are all listed troops not more efficient than Spearfighters ? SUCKS !
And thus the (muscular and technique master) WARRIORS should be able to do it. To me an improvement should at least come with the Horsemen in some way. They definitely can not escape the enemy's attacks and even if I had have 8 of them, I am sure, that I would not have been able to win it either. Third, the Warriors may take two more attacks compared to the Spearfigthers, but can not get the Legionnaire down with their damage.įourth, the Stone Throwers more or less the same as with Slingshots. Second, the Horsemen are not really stronger than the Spearfighters they don't even have more lifepoints. And as soon as the enemy has Archers, you can't run from their shots with the Slingshots cruising all over the map. The first problem is that the Slingshots are too weak compared to their lifepoints. Thus I researched and researched new types of troops with the hope for a stronger one.
However, with the Spearfighters I am even not strong enough to beat the army with only 1 Legionnaire, 2 Archers and 3 Soldiers. I am new to the game and was not able to find an appropriate thread, so here is my problem.Ĭurrently I am at Badakus and there is one army with 3 Legionnaires and 3 Soldiers.
0 kommentar(er)
